Rectifying Misconceptions: A Comprehensive Response to “Some Concerns About the Psychological Implications of Mindfulness: A Critical Analysis”
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-28-2014
Abstract
The present article attempts to address misconceptions and mischaracterizations of mindfulness-based interventions found in the article “Some Concerns about the Psychological Implications of Mindfulness: A Critical Analysis,” written by Daniel David. The paper, we contended, suffers as a result of its reductive presentation of mindfulness, the relationship of mindfulness to Buddhist thought, the empirical support for mindfulness-based interventions, and the presumed mechanisms of change and clinical utility of those interventions. Such misconceptions and mischaracterizations can unfortunately have a powerful effect on both the literature base, and on those providing direct psychological services. As such, the purpose of this response article is to stimulate a clear and accurate discussion of the concepts and applications of mindfulness, so that practitioners have the information they need to make sound treatment decisions for their clientele.
Publication Title
Journal of Rational - Emotive and Cognitive - Behavior Therapy
First Page Number
325
Last Page Number
344
DOI
10.1007/s10942-014-0196-1
Recommended Citation
Gardner, Frank L.; Moore, Zella E.; and Marks, Donald R., "Rectifying Misconceptions: A Comprehensive Response to “Some Concerns About the Psychological Implications of Mindfulness: A Critical Analysis”" (2014). Kean Publications. 1944.
https://digitalcommons.kean.edu/keanpublications/1944